This page explains how Rightlight6 reads a room, what kinds of signals it can infer from room media, and where the confidence boundaries stop.
The aim is trust through clarity: explain the method well enough that users understand both the usefulness and the limits of the room read.
Methodology boundary
Rightlight6 is intentionally narrow. It can interpret visible room patterns and comfort clues, but it should not pretend to produce exact lux measurements, mould diagnosis, or regulated inspection outcomes from photos alone.
Can read
Daylight reach, layering gaps, glare patterns, bedroom comfort cues, and visible damp overlap where relevant.
Cannot prove
Exact measurements, hidden building defects, or formal health or safety conclusions.
Confidence
Depends on image quality, room coverage, and whether the problem is actually visible on camera.
What matters here
The room audit looks for visible clues that explain why a room feels wrong: daylight drop-off, harsh overhead glare, weak lamp layering, sleep-hostile lighting, or visible overlap between discomfort and colder or moisture-prone room edges.
Some rooms are easy to read from images; others are not. Confidence matters because a trustworthy product should admit uncertainty where coverage, lighting conditions, or camera quality weaken the interpretation.
The method is useful when it helps the user understand the strongest visible problem, the first fix worth trying, and the limits of what the system can responsibly say from room media alone.