Rightlight6 Room lighting audit
Methodology

About methodology

This page explains how Rightlight6 reads a room, what kinds of signals it can infer from room media, and where the limits are.

This page explains what the audit can read from room photos, where the limits are, and why confidence still matters.

Methodology boundary

Rightlight6 can read visible room patterns and comfort clues, but it cannot replace measurements, formal inspection, or a professional mould diagnosis from photos alone.

Can read

Daylight reach, layering gaps, glare patterns, bedroom comfort cues, and visible damp overlap where relevant.

Cannot prove

Exact measurements, hidden building defects, or formal health or safety conclusions.

Confidence

Depends on image quality, room coverage, and whether the problem is actually visible on camera.

What matters here

What the audit actually evaluates

The room audit looks for visible clues that explain why a room feels wrong: daylight drop-off, harsh overhead glare, weak lamp layering, sleep-hostile lighting, or visible overlap between discomfort and colder or moisture-prone room edges.

Why some findings are more certain than others

Some rooms are easy to read from images; others are not. Confidence matters because poor coverage, bad lighting, or weak image quality can make the result less certain.

What makes the method useful

The method is useful when it helps the user see the strongest visible problem, the first fix worth trying, and the limits of what can honestly be read from room media alone.